High Court Ruling Addresses Islamic Tenets

The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court has given a landmark decision holding that Muslims cannot assert rights in live-in partnerships if they have living spouses. The court’s decision, based on Islamic principles and constitutional morality, has repercussions for those negotiating concerns of personal liberty and cultural standards.

High Court Ruling

In a recent decision, the Allahabad High Court heard the case of Sneha Devi and Mohd Shadab Khan, who sought protection from police action after the woman’s parents filed a kidnapping complaint. The court, which included justices AR Masoodi and AK Srivastava-I, highlighted that Islamic teachings prohibit live-in relationships within existing marriages.

Case Background

Sneha Devi and Mohd Shadab Khan asked the court for protection, claiming to be in a live-in relationship. However, the woman’s parents claimed kidnapping and compelled marriage, initiating a court investigation. The petitioners claimed Article 21 of the Constitution, claiming the right to liberty and autonomy. The Allahabad High Court opinion dives into the interplay of religious beliefs, societal standards, and constitutional restrictions. While respecting the right to personal liberty guaranteed by Article 21, the court stressed the significance of safeguarding both constitutional and societal morality.

Islamic Tenets and Live-in Relationships

The court clarified that Islamic law forbids live-in partnerships where one or both parties are already married. This position is consistent with established religious norms and emphasizes the importance of conforming to cultural and religious traditions. In deciding the case, the court struck a careful balance between constitutional morality and societal expectations. While acknowledging individual rights as paramount, the court highlighted the importance of adhering to prevalent conventions and traditions.

Protection of Individual Rights

While Article 21 ensures the protection of life and personal liberty, the court noted that these rights must be exercised in accordance with prevailing community standards. The decision emphasizes the importance of taking a balanced approach when deciding on issues involving personal ties and religious convictions. The Allahabad High Court’s decision has important consequences for people navigating complex personal relationships, especially in the setting of religious and cultural standards. The decision emphasizes the need of balancing individual rights and society obligations.

The Allahabad High Court’s decision serves as a reminder of the intricacies involved in deciding issues of personal liberty and cultural norms. By analyzing the interplay of Islamic beliefs, constitutional laws, and social expectations, the court sheds light on the changing legal landscape surrounding live-in partnerships.

Read more: Marketing NewsAdvertising News, PR and Finance NewsDigital News



Riya Sen, an experienced editor at Atom News, is passionate about health and politics reporting. Riya Sen commitment to promoting well-being and highlighting political developments adds a valuable dimension to our coverage, ensuring our readers stay informed and engaged in current affairs.