The Enforcement Directorate (ED) is gearing up to submit a fresh prosecution complaint in the Delhi liquor policy scam, with plans to potentially name Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) as accused parties. The chargesheet, akin to a supplementary chargesheet, is expected to be filed before May 15, within the 60-day deadline since the arrest of K Kavitha, a Telangana MLC and co-accused in the case.

Potential Accused

The upcoming chargesheet is currently in its final drafting stage and is likely to include the names of “four or five” additional accused individuals, apart from those already named in the previous six chargesheets related to the case. Among the new names expected to be mentioned are Arvind Kejriwal, K Kavitha, and Chanpreet Singh, a Goa-based political worker arrested on April 15.

Allegations and Legal Precedent

The decision to potentially name the AAP as an accused party marks an unprecedented move by the ED. However, officials claim to have received sound legal advice to support this action. The possibility of naming the AAP was acknowledged during proceedings in the Supreme Court by Additional Solicitor General S V Raju, who indicated invoking Section 70 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act to probe the party’s alleged involvement.

Opposition’s Response

Senior Supreme Court lawyer Abhishek Singhvi criticized the move, arguing that treating a political party like a company under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) would be unprecedented and could lead to the misuse of law to undermine political opponents. He highlighted the potential ramifications of such actions on democracy and electoral processes.

Legal Analysis

The ED contends that the AAP qualifies as a political party under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and falls within the definition of “company” as outlined in Section 70 of the PMLA. This provision extends the scope of the anti-money laundering law to include entities such as political parties, which are considered associations of individuals.

Interpretation of Section 70

While political parties are not incorporated companies under the Companies Act, 2013, the ED argues that the definition of “company” under the PMLA encompasses associations of individuals, thus potentially bringing political parties under its purview. This interpretation has significant implications for the treatment of political entities in cases of alleged financial irregularities.

Criticism and Concerns

Critics, including senior lawyers like Kapil Sibal, have raised objections to treating political parties as companies under the PMLA. They argue that such actions would be inappropriate and motivated by malice, with the intent to discredit and weaken political opponents. Additionally, they caution against the potential misuse of legal provisions to target political adversaries.

Potential Ramifications

The ED’s decision to name the AAP as an accused party in the Delhi liquor case has sparked debates about the intersection of law, politics, and democracy. If pursued, this move could set a precedent for the treatment of political entities in cases of alleged financial wrongdoing, with far-reaching implications for the political landscape.

The ED’s forthcoming chargesheet in the Delhi liquor case, with the potential inclusion of the AAP as an accused party, underscores the complexities of law enforcement and political accountability. As legal proceedings unfold, the ramifications of such actions on democracy and political discourse remain subjects of intense scrutiny and debate.

Read more: Marketing NewsAdvertising News, PR and Finance NewsDigital News



Riya Sen, an experienced editor at Atom News, is passionate about health and politics reporting. Riya Sen commitment to promoting well-being and highlighting political developments adds a valuable dimension to our coverage, ensuring our readers stay informed and engaged in current affairs.